Mitsubishi Eclipse 1992 vs Toyota Celica 1990
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 137 HP | 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 169 NM | 186 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Eclipse engine produces 19 HP less power than Toyota Celica, whereas torque is 17 NM less than Toyota Celica. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 7.8 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 45 years | 21 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Toyota Carina E | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Mitsubishi Eclipse engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.31 m | 1.30 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Eclipse is 3 cm shorter than the Toyota Celica, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 289 litres | 320 litres | |
|
Toyota Celica has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Eclipse has 31 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Celica. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Eclipse is 0.6 metres more than that of the Toyota Celica, which means Mitsubishi Eclipse can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Toyota Celica has
| |