Mitsubishi Eclipse 2005 vs Dodge Charger 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.8 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 263 HP | 253 HP | |
| Torque: | 353 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Eclipse engine produces 10 HP more power than Dodge Charger, whereas torque is 13 NM more than Dodge Charger. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.9 | 10.7 | |
| Mitsubishi Eclipse consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dodge Charger, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Eclipse could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 67 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.56 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Eclipse is smaller. Mitsubishi Eclipse is 52 cm shorter than the Dodge Charger, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Eclipse is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 445 litres | 456 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 1`945 kg | 2`185 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`575 kg | 1`735 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 370 kg | 450 kg | |
| Mitsubishi Eclipse load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 22 procentiem less than Dodge Charger. Therefore, Dodge Charger is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Eclipse has
|
Dodge Charger has
| |