Mitsubishi Eclipse 2005 vs Chevrolet Camaro 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.8 Petrol | 3.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 263 HP | 312 HP | |
| Torque: | 353 NM | 377 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Eclipse engine produces 49 HP less power than Chevrolet Camaro, whereas torque is 24 NM less than Chevrolet Camaro. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.9 | 11.1 | |
| Mitsubishi Eclipse consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Camaro, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Eclipse over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 67 litres | 72 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Mitsubishi Eclipse) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Chevrolet Camaro) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.56 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Eclipse is smaller. Mitsubishi Eclipse is 27 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Camaro, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Eclipse is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 445 litres | 320 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Eclipse has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Mitsubishi Eclipse has 125 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Camaro. The Chevrolet Camaro may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`945 | 1`700 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 17 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Eclipse has
|
Chevrolet Camaro has
| |