Mitsubishi Eclipse 2009 vs Volvo V40 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Coupe | Hatchback | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
Engines: | 2.4 - 3.8 (petrol) | 1.5 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Both cars are available with petrol engines. Volvo V40 is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 162 - 265 HP | 120 - 245 HP | |
Torque: | 220 - 355 NM | 220 - 400 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 6.3 - 10.5 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.7 - 11.6 | 3.4 - 5.9 | |
Mitsubishi Eclipse petrol engines consumes on average 5.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo V40. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.58 m | 4.37 m | |
Width: | 1.84 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.36 m | 1.44 m | |
Mitsubishi Eclipse is larger, but lower. Mitsubishi Eclipse is 21 cm longer than the Volvo V40, 3 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Eclipse is 8 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 335 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
445 litres | 1500 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Eclipse is 1.4 metres more than that of the Volvo V40, which means Mitsubishi Eclipse can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`920 | ~ 1`978 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | no data | 12 200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Eclipse has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |