Mitsubishi Eclipse 2009 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2019
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Coupe | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mitsubishi Eclipse is available only with front wheel drive, while Mitsubishi ASX can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.4 - 3.8 | 1.6 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 162 - 265 HP | 117 - 167 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 - 355 NM | 154 - 222 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 10.2 - 11.7 seconds | |
| In general, Mitsubishi Eclipse are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Mitsubishi ASX. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.7 - 11.6 | 6.1 - 7.9 | |
|
Mitsubishi Eclipse petrol engines consumes on average 3.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi ASX. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 148 mm (5.8 inches) | 190 - 205 mm (7.5 - 8.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi ASX can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Eclipse is larger, but lower. Mitsubishi Eclipse is 22 cm longer than the Mitsubishi ASX, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Eclipse is 28 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 406 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
445 litres | 1206 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Eclipse is 1.6 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi ASX, which means Mitsubishi Eclipse can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`920 kg | ~ 1`950 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`540 kg | ~ 1`404 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 380 kg | ~ 546 kg | |
| Mitsubishi Eclipse load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 44 procentiem less than Mitsubishi ASX. Therefore, Mitsubishi ASX is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 15 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Eclipse has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |
