Mitsubishi Eclipse 2009 vs Ford Mustang 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mitsubishi Eclipse is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Ford Mustang is available only with manual gearbox. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Mitsubishi Eclipse is available with front wheel drive, while Ford Mustang can be equipped with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.4 - 3.8 | 5.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 162 - 265 HP | 540 - 550 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 - 355 NM | 691 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.7 - 11.6 | 13.1 - 13.9 | |
|
Mitsubishi Eclipse petrol engines consumes on average 2.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Mustang. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.96 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Eclipse is smaller. Mitsubishi Eclipse is 20 cm shorter than the Ford Mustang, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Eclipse is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 379 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
445 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Eclipse is 1.2 metres more than that of the Ford Mustang, which means Mitsubishi Eclipse can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`920 | ~ 2`856 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 16 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Eclipse has
|
Ford Mustang has
| |