Mitsubishi Eclipse 2009 vs Chevrolet Camaro 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mitsubishi Eclipse is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Chevrolet Camaro is available only with manual gearbox. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Mitsubishi Eclipse is available with front wheel drive, while Chevrolet Camaro can be equipped with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.4 - 3.8 | 3.6 - 6.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 162 - 265 HP | 312 - 426 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 - 355 NM | 377 - 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.7 - 11.6 | 11.1 | |
|
Mitsubishi Eclipse petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Camaro. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Eclipse is smaller. Mitsubishi Eclipse is 25 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Camaro, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Eclipse is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 320 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
445 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`920 | ~ 1`737 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 17 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Eclipse has
|
Chevrolet Camaro has
| |