Mitsubishi Eclipse 1992 vs Toyota Celica 1990
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 94 - 198 HP | 105 - 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 142 - 275 NM | 142 - 275 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.8 - 9.2 seconds | 6.9 - 11 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 7.0 - 9.2 | |
|
Mitsubishi Eclipse petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Celica. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.31 m | 1.30 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Eclipse is 4 cm shorter than the Toyota Celica, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 289 litres | 320 litres | |
|
Toyota Celica has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Eclipse has 31 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Celica. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Eclipse is 0.6 metres more than that of the Toyota Celica, which means Mitsubishi Eclipse can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`890 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Toyota Celica has
| |