Mitsubishi Eclipse 1992 vs Ford Mustang 1994
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Mitsubishi Eclipse is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Ford Mustang can be equipped only with rear wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 1.8 - 2.0 | 3.8 - 4.6 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 94 - 198 HP | 147 - 305 HP | |
Torque: | 142 - 275 NM | 292 - 407 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.8 - 9.2 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 9.3 - 11.3 | |
Mitsubishi Eclipse petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Mustang. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.38 m | 4.62 m | |
Width: | 1.69 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.31 m | 1.34 m | |
Mitsubishi Eclipse is smaller. Mitsubishi Eclipse is 24 cm shorter than the Ford Mustang, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Eclipse is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 289 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Eclipse is 0.1 metres less than that of the Ford Mustang. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 5600 | 6000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Eclipse has
|
| |