Mitsubishi Eclipse 1996 vs Mazda MX-3 1991
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 2.0 | 1.6 - 1.8 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 146 HP | 90 - 135 HP | |
Torque: | 177 NM | 135 - 160 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 8.5 - 10.5 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.7 | 6.9 - 9.5 | |
Mitsubishi Eclipse petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda MX-3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.38 m | 4.22 m | |
Width: | 1.74 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.30 m | 1.31 m | |
Mitsubishi Eclipse is larger, but slightly lower. Mitsubishi Eclipse is 16 cm longer than the Mazda MX-3, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Eclipse is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 241 litres | 289 litres | |
Mazda MX-3 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Eclipse has 48 litres less trunk space than the Mazda MX-3. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Eclipse uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 9.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Eclipse is 1.8 metres more than that of the Mazda MX-3, which means Mitsubishi Eclipse can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`750 | ~ 1`474 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1600 | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Mazda MX-3 has
| |