Mitsubishi Eclipse 1996 vs Toyota Celica 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 | 1.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 146 HP | 143 - 192 HP | |
| Torque: | 177 NM | 170 - 180 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 7.4 - 8.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.7 | 7.7 - 8.4 | |
|
Mitsubishi Eclipse petrol engines consumes on average 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Celica. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.35 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.32 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Eclipse is 3 cm longer than the Toyota Celica, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Eclipse is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 241 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Eclipse is 1.2 metres more than that of the Toyota Celica, which means Mitsubishi Eclipse can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`750 | ~ 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Eclipse has
|
Toyota Celica has
| |