Mitsubishi Eclipse 1996 vs Ford Cougar 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mitsubishi Eclipse is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Ford Cougar has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 146 HP | 130 - 205 HP | |
| Torque: | 177 NM | 176 - 234 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 7.8 - 10.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.7 | 8.3 - 10.2 | |
|
Mitsubishi Eclipse petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Cougar. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.32 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Eclipse is smaller. Mitsubishi Eclipse is 32 cm shorter than the Ford Cougar, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Eclipse is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 241 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 930 litres | |
|
Ford Cougar has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Eclipse has 189 litres less trunk space than the Ford Cougar. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Eclipse is 0.7 metres more than that of the Ford Cougar, which means Mitsubishi Eclipse can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`750 | ~ 1`799 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Eclipse has
|
Ford Cougar has
| |