Mitsubishi Eclipse 1999 vs Mitsubishi Lancer 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 2.4 - 3.0 | 1.3 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 142 - 200 HP | 82 - 135 HP | |
| Torque: | 214 - 278 NM | 120 - 176 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 seconds | 9.7 - 13.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 - 10.1 | 6.5 - 8.4 | |
|
Mitsubishi Eclipse petrol engines consumes on average 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Lancer. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.46 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.31 m | 1.45 m | |
| Mitsubishi Eclipse is 3 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Lancer, 6 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Eclipse is 14 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 430 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Eclipse has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Mitsubishi Eclipse has 50 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Lancer. The Mitsubishi Lancer may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`826 | ~ 1`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Eclipse has
|
Mitsubishi Lancer has
| |