Mitsubishi Eclipse 1999 vs Ford Mustang 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Mitsubishi Eclipse is available with front wheel drive, while Ford Mustang can be equipped with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.4 - 3.0 | 3.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 142 - 200 HP | 193 HP | |
| Torque: | 214 - 278 NM | 298 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 - 10.1 | 12.0 | |
|
Mitsubishi Eclipse petrol engines consumes on average 2.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Mustang. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.46 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.31 m | 1.35 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Eclipse is smaller. Mitsubishi Eclipse is 21 cm shorter than the Ford Mustang, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Eclipse is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`826 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 16 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Eclipse has
|
| |