Mitsubishi Eclipse 2005 vs Ford Mustang 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Mitsubishi Eclipse is available with front wheel drive, while Ford Mustang can be equipped with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.4 - 3.8 | 4.0 - 5.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 162 - 263 HP | 212 - 540 HP | |
| Torque: | 217 - 353 NM | 325 - 691 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 4.5 - 7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 - 10.9 | 10.4 - 13.0 | |
|
Mitsubishi Eclipse petrol engines consumes on average 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Mustang. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.55 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.35 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Eclipse is smaller. Mitsubishi Eclipse is 22 cm shorter than the Ford Mustang, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Eclipse is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 479 litres | 350 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Eclipse has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Mitsubishi Eclipse has 129 litres more trunk space than the Ford Mustang. The Ford Mustang may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`920 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 10 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Eclipse has
|
| |