Mitsubishi Eclipse 2005 vs Dodge Charger 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Mitsubishi Eclipse is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Dodge Charger is available only with automatic gearbox. | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Mitsubishi Eclipse is available only with front wheel drive, while Dodge Charger can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
Engines: | 2.4 - 3.8 | 2.7 - 6.1 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 162 - 263 HP | 193 - 432 HP | |
Torque: | 217 - 353 NM | 258 - 569 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 4.9 - 6 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 - 10.9 | 9.8 - 14.7 | |
Mitsubishi Eclipse petrol engines consumes on average 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Dodge Charger. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.55 m | 5.08 m | |
Width: | 1.82 m | 1.89 m | |
Height: | 1.35 m | 1.48 m | |
Mitsubishi Eclipse is smaller. Mitsubishi Eclipse is 53 cm shorter than the Dodge Charger, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Eclipse is 13 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 479 litres | 460 litres | |
Even though the car is shorter, Mitsubishi Eclipse has 19 litres more trunk space than the Dodge Charger. The Dodge Charger may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 11.9 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`920 | ~ 2`185 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 3600 | 6800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Eclipse has
|
Dodge Charger has
| |