Mitsubishi Eclipse 2005 vs Chevrolet Camaro 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Mitsubishi Eclipse is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Chevrolet Camaro is available only with manual gearbox. | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Mitsubishi Eclipse is available with front wheel drive, while Chevrolet Camaro can be equipped with rear wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 2.4 - 3.8 | 3.6 - 6.2 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 162 - 263 HP | 312 - 426 HP | |
Torque: | 217 - 353 NM | 377 - 420 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | n/a seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 - 10.9 | 11.1 | |
Mitsubishi Eclipse petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Camaro. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.55 m | 4.84 m | |
Width: | 1.82 m | 1.92 m | |
Height: | 1.35 m | 1.38 m | |
Mitsubishi Eclipse is smaller. Mitsubishi Eclipse is 29 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Camaro, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Eclipse is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 479 litres | 320 litres | |
Mitsubishi Eclipse has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Mitsubishi Eclipse has 159 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Camaro. The Chevrolet Camaro may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`920 | ~ 1`737 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 3600 | 17 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Eclipse has
|
Chevrolet Camaro has
| |