Mitsubishi Carisma 2001 vs Opel Astra 1999

 
Mitsubishi Carisma
2001 - 2003
Opel Astra
1999 - 2004
Body: SedanHatchback
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel2.0 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming chain
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors.

Performance

Power: 102 HP101 HP
Torque: 215 NM230 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.9 seconds12 seconds
Mitsubishi Carisma engine produces 1 HP more power than Opel Astra, but torque is 15 NM less than Opel Astra. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Carisma reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.55.7
Real fuel consumption: 6.0 l/100km6.1 l/100km
By specification Mitsubishi Carisma consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Astra, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Carisma over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Carisma consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Astra.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres52 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1090 km in combined cycle910 km in combined cycle
1330 km on highway1130 km on highway
1000 km with real consumption850 km with real consumption
Mitsubishi Carisma gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km440'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 8 years5 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Volvo V40, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Volvo S40Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Opel Zafira, Opel Signum
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Carisma might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: noyes
The Opel Astra engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.
Mitsubishi Carisma 2001 1.9 engine: Long-lasting and fuel-efficient engine. Maintaining oil change and maintenance intervals is essential for a long engine life, as poor or untimely oil changes can result in turbine and oil pump damage, followed ...  More about Mitsubishi Carisma 2001 1.9 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.48 m4.11 m
Width: 1.71 m1.71 m
Height: 1.40 m1.42 m
Mitsubishi Carisma is 37 cm longer than the Opel Astra, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Carisma is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 460 litres370 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1180 litres
Mitsubishi Carisma has more luggage capacity.
Mitsubishi Carisma has 90 litres more trunk space than the Opel Astra.
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters10.1 meters
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Carisma is 0.3 metres more than that of the Opel Astra.
Gross weight (kg): 1`775no data
Safety:
Quality:
average

above average
Opel Astra has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Carisma has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Opel Astra, so Opel Astra quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 8001000
Rating in user reviews: 7.9/10 7.5/10
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi Carisma has
  • timing belt engine
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Opel Astra has
  • timing chain engine
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • higher safety
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv