Mitsubishi Carisma 1997 vs Mitsubishi Carisma 2000
Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
---|---|---|---|
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 100 HP | 100 HP | |
Torque: | 137 NM | 137 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 seconds | 15 seconds | |
Mitsubishi Carisma 1997 and Mitsubishi Carisma 2000 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 8.3 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
950 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 15 years | 15 years | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.48 m | 4.48 m | |
Width: | 1.71 m | 1.71 m | |
Height: | 1.40 m | 1.40 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Carisma 1997 and Mitsubishi Carisma 2000 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 430 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
460 litres | 1150 litres | |
Mitsubishi Carisma 1997 has 30 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Carisma 2000. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Carisma 2000 (by 690 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`630 | 1`715 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | average | average | |
Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.9/10 | 7.9/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Carisma has
|
| |