Mitsubishi Carisma 1997 vs Honda Civic 2001

 
Mitsubishi Carisma
1997 - 2003
Honda Civic
2001 - 2005
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 100 HP90 HP
Torque: 137 NM120 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.1 seconds11.3 seconds
Mitsubishi Carisma engine produces 10 HP more power than Honda Civic, whereas torque is 17 NM more than Honda Civic. Despite the higher power, Mitsubishi Carisma reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.26.4
The Honda Civic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mitsubishi Carisma consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Civic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Carisma could require 120 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 830 km in combined cycle780 km in combined cycle
1050 km on highway920 km on highway
Mitsubishi Carisma gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.48 m4.46 m
Width: 1.71 m1.72 m
Height: 1.40 m1.44 m
Mitsubishi Carisma is 2 cm longer than the Honda Civic, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Carisma is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 460 litres450 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
460 litresno data
Mitsubishi Carisma has 10 litres more trunk space than the Honda Civic.
Turning diameter: 10.4 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): 1`6301`550
Safety:
Quality:
average

above average
Honda Civic has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Carisma has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Honda Civic, so Honda Civic quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): 8001000
Rating in user reviews: 7.9/10 8.2/10
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi Carisma has
  • more power
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Honda Civic has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • higher safety
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv