Mitsubishi Carisma 1997 vs Honda Civic 2001
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 100 HP | 90 HP | |
Torque: | 137 NM | 120 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
Mitsubishi Carisma engine produces 10 HP more power than Honda Civic, whereas torque is 17 NM more than Honda Civic. Despite the higher power, Mitsubishi Carisma reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 6.4 | |
The Honda Civic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Carisma consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Civic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Carisma could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 50 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
1050 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
Mitsubishi Carisma gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.48 m | 4.46 m | |
Width: | 1.71 m | 1.72 m | |
Height: | 1.40 m | 1.44 m | |
Mitsubishi Carisma is 2 cm longer than the Honda Civic, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Carisma is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 450 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
460 litres | no data | |
Mitsubishi Carisma has 10 litres more trunk space than the Honda Civic. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`630 | 1`550 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | average | above average | |
Honda Civic has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Carisma has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Honda Civic, so Honda Civic quality is probably slightly better | |||
Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.9/10 | 8.2/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Carisma has
|
Honda Civic has
| |