Mitsubishi Carisma 2001 vs Seat Toledo 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 265 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Seat Toledo is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Carisma engine produces 25 HP less power than Seat Toledo, whereas torque is 55 NM less than Seat Toledo. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Carisma reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Carisma is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Carisma consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Toledo, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Carisma over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Carisma consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Toledo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1110 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 1360 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| 980 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Carisma gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.46 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.57 m | |
| Mitsubishi Carisma is 2 cm longer than the Seat Toledo, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Carisma is 17 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1050 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Carisma is 0.5 metres less than that of the Seat Toledo, which means Mitsubishi Carisma can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`795 | 1`400 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Mitsubishi Carisma has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Toledo has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Carisma, so Mitsubishi Carisma quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Carisma has
|
Seat Toledo has
| |