Mitsubishi Carisma 2001 vs Nissan Almera 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 265 NM | 248 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Carisma is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Carisma engine produces 3 HP more power than Nissan Almera, whereas torque is 17 NM more than Nissan Almera. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Carisma reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Carisma is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Carisma consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Almera, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Carisma over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Carisma consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Almera. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1110 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 1360 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| 980 km with real consumption | 950 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Carisma gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.20 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.45 m | |
| Mitsubishi Carisma is 28 cm longer than the Nissan Almera, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Carisma is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 355 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1050 litres | 1020 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Carisma has more luggage capacity. Mitsubishi Carisma has 75 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Almera. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Carisma (by 30 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`795 | 1`810 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Nissan Almera has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Mitsubishi Carisma, so Nissan Almera quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.9/10 | 9.2/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Carisma has
|
Nissan Almera has
| |