Mitsubishi Carisma 2001 vs Mazda 626 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 265 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Carisma is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Carisma engine produces 5 HP more power than Mazda 626, whereas torque is 35 NM more than Mazda 626. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Carisma reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 5.8 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mitsubishi Carisma consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Carisma over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mitsubishi Carisma consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1110 km in combined cycle | 1080 km in combined cycle | |
| 1360 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
| 980 km with real consumption | 1100 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Mazda 626 1999 2.0 engine: The engine is reliable if you use quality diesel. Turbine life is not very long, however. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.59 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.43 m | |
| Mitsubishi Carisma is 11 cm shorter than the Mazda 626, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Carisma is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 502 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1050 litres | no data | |
|
Mazda 626 has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Carisma has 72 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 626. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`795 | 1`770 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | Mitsubishi Carisma has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 626 has serious deffects in 115 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Carisma, so Mitsubishi Carisma quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.9/10 | 6.2/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Carisma has
|
Mazda 626 has
| |