Mitsubishi Carisma 2001 vs Honda Accord 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 265 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 13.5 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Carisma is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Carisma engine produces 10 HP more power than Honda Accord, whereas torque is 55 NM more than Honda Accord. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Carisma reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 6.4 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Carisma is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Carisma consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Accord, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Carisma over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1110 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 1360 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Carisma gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Carisma is smaller. Mitsubishi Carisma is 12 cm shorter than the Honda Accord, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Carisma is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 450 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1050 litres | no data | |
| Mitsubishi Carisma has 20 litres less trunk space than the Honda Accord. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Carisma is 1 metres less than that of the Honda Accord, which means Mitsubishi Carisma can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`795 | 1`960 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | Mitsubishi Carisma has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda Accord has serious deffects in 80 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Carisma, so Mitsubishi Carisma quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Carisma has
|
Honda Accord has
| |