Mitsubishi Carisma 2001 vs Citroen C5 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 265 NM | 317 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Carisma engine produces 21 HP less power than Citroen C5, whereas torque is 52 NM less than Citroen C5. Despite less power, Mitsubishi Carisma reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 7.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Carisma is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Carisma consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C5, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Carisma over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Carisma consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1110 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 1360 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
| 980 km with real consumption | 840 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Carisma gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Carisma is smaller. Mitsubishi Carisma is 14 cm shorter than the Citroen C5, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Carisma is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 456 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1050 litres | no data | |
|
Citroen C5 has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Carisma has 26 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C5. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Carisma is 2.1 metres less than that of the Citroen C5, which means Mitsubishi Carisma can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`795 kg | 2`020 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`285 kg | 1`520 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 510 kg | 500 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Mitsubishi Carisma has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C5 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Carisma, so Mitsubishi Carisma quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Carisma has
|
Citroen C5 has
| |