Mitsubishi Carisma 2001 vs Rover 45 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 265 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Carisma is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Carisma engine produces 15 HP more power than Rover 45, whereas torque is 25 NM more than Rover 45. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Carisma reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 5.4 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1110 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 1360 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| 980 km with real consumption | 910 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Carisma gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Carisma is larger. Mitsubishi Carisma is 12 cm longer than the Rover 45, 1 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Carisma is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 380 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1050 litres | 717 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Carisma has more luggage capacity. Mitsubishi Carisma has 50 litres more trunk space than the Rover 45. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Carisma (by 333 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`795 | 1`720 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Carisma has
|
Rover 45 has
| |