Mitsubishi Carisma 2001 vs Fiat Brava 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 65 HP | |
| Torque: | 265 NM | 119 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 17.8 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Carisma is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Carisma engine produces 50 HP more power than Fiat Brava, whereas torque is 146 NM more than Fiat Brava. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Carisma reaches 100 km/h speed 7.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 6.1 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Carisma is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Carisma consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Brava, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Carisma over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1110 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 1360 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Carisma gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.19 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.41 m | |
| Mitsubishi Carisma is 29 cm longer than the Fiat Brava, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Carisma is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 380 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1050 litres | 1165 litres | |
| Mitsubishi Carisma has 50 litres more trunk space than the Fiat Brava. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Fiat Brava (by 115 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`795 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Carisma has
|
Fiat Brava has
| |