Mitsubishi Carisma 2003 vs Mitsubishi Carisma 2001
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 102 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 215 NM | 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Carisma 2001 is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Carisma 2003 engine produces 13 HP less power than Mitsubishi Carisma 2001, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Mitsubishi Carisma 2001. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Carisma 2003 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 5.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Carisma 2001 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Carisma 2003 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Carisma 2001, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Carisma 2003 could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Carisma 2003 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Carisma 2001. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1090 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km with real consumption | 1000 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.40 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Carisma 2003 and Mitsubishi Carisma 2001 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 460 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Carisma 2001 has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Carisma 2003 has 30 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Carisma 2001. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 1`775 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.9/10 | 7.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mitsubishi Carisma has
| |