Mitsubishi Carisma 2003 vs Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution 2003
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Mitsubishi Carisma) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 102 HP | 265 HP | |
| Torque: | 215 NM | 355 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 6.1 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Carisma engine produces 163 HP less power than Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution, whereas torque is 140 NM less than Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Carisma reaches 100 km/h speed 5.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 13.0 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Carisma is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Carisma consumes 7.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Carisma over 15,000 km in a year you can save 1125 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1090 km in combined cycle | 420 km in combined cycle | |
| Mitsubishi Carisma gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Carisma is smaller. Mitsubishi Carisma is 1 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Carisma is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 430 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Carisma is 1.4 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution, which means Mitsubishi Carisma can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 1`885 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 29 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Carisma has
|
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution has
| |