Mitsubishi Carisma 1997 vs Seat Ibiza 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 174 NM | 116 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 15 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Carisma is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Carisma engine produces 65 HP more power than Seat Ibiza, whereas torque is 58 NM more than Seat Ibiza. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Carisma reaches 100 km/h speed 4.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mitsubishi Carisma consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ibiza, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Carisma could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Carisma consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ibiza. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 1110 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| 810 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Carisma gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 3.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Carisma is larger, but slightly lower. Mitsubishi Carisma is 63 cm longer than the Seat Ibiza, 7 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Carisma is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
660 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Carisma is 0.6 metres more than that of the Seat Ibiza, which means Mitsubishi Carisma can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`685 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Mitsubishi Carisma has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Ibiza has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Carisma, so Mitsubishi Carisma quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Carisma has
|
Seat Ibiza has
| |