Mitsubishi Carisma 1997 vs Honda Civic 1995
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 125 HP | 114 HP | |
Torque: | 174 NM | 138 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
Mitsubishi Carisma engine produces 11 HP more power than Honda Civic, whereas torque is 36 NM more than Honda Civic. Despite the higher power, Mitsubishi Carisma reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 6.5 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
The Honda Civic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Carisma consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Civic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Carisma could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Carisma consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Civic. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
1110 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
810 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
Mitsubishi Carisma gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.48 m | 4.19 m | |
Width: | 1.71 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.40 m | 1.38 m | |
Mitsubishi Carisma is larger. Mitsubishi Carisma is 29 cm longer than the Honda Civic, 1 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Carisma is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 225 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
660 litres | 600 litres | |
Mitsubishi Carisma has more luggage capacity. Mitsubishi Carisma has 205 litres more trunk space than the Honda Civic. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Carisma (by 60 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Carisma is 0.4 metres more than that of the Honda Civic, which means Mitsubishi Carisma can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`685 | 1`475 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | Mitsubishi Carisma has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda Civic has serious deffects in 120 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Carisma, so Mitsubishi Carisma quality is probably significantly better | ||
Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.9/10 | 9.0/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Carisma has
|
Honda Civic has
| |