Mitsubishi Carisma 2003 vs Mitsubishi Carisma 1997
Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
---|---|---|---|
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 100 HP | 100 HP | |
Torque: | 137 NM | 137 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
Mitsubishi Carisma 2003 and Mitsubishi Carisma 1997 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 7.2 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
1050 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 15 years | 15 years | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.48 m | 4.48 m | |
Width: | 1.71 m | 1.71 m | |
Height: | 1.40 m | 1.40 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Carisma 2003 and Mitsubishi Carisma 1997 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 460 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 460 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`660 | 1`630 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | average | average | |
Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.9/10 | 7.9/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Mitsubishi Carisma has
| |