Mitsubishi Carisma 1995 vs Mitsubishi Carisma 2000
Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
---|---|---|---|
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 HP | 100 HP | |
Torque: | 137 NM | 137 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.3 seconds | 15 seconds | |
Mitsubishi Carisma 1995 engine produces 10 HP less power than Mitsubishi Carisma 2000, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite less power, Mitsubishi Carisma 1995 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 8.3 | |
Mitsubishi Carisma 1995 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Carisma 2000, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Carisma 1995 could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
880 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.44 m | 4.48 m | |
Width: | 1.71 m | 1.71 m | |
Height: | 1.41 m | 1.40 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Carisma 1995 is 5 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Carisma 2000, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 430 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
460 litres | 1150 litres | |
Even though the car is shorter, Mitsubishi Carisma 1995 has 30 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Carisma 2000. The Mitsubishi Carisma 2000 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Carisma 2000 (by 690 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`610 | 1`715 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | Mitsubishi Carisma 2000 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Carisma 1995 has serious deffects in 150 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Carisma 2000, so Mitsubishi Carisma 2000 quality is probably significantly better | ||
Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.9/10 | 7.9/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Carisma has
|
Mitsubishi Carisma has
| |