Mitsubishi Carisma 1995 vs Mitsubishi Lancer 1996
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 137 NM | 108 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.3 seconds | 15.8 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Carisma is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Carisma engine produces 15 HP more power than Mitsubishi Lancer, whereas torque is 29 NM more than Mitsubishi Lancer. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Carisma reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 8.0 | |
| Mitsubishi Carisma consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Carisma could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Carisma gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Carisma is larger. Mitsubishi Carisma is 14 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Lancer, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
460 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Carisma is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Lancer. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`610 | 1`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Carisma has
|
| |