Mitsubishi Carisma 1995 vs Mitsubishi Carisma 1997
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 162 NM | 174 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Carisma 1995 engine produces 9 HP less power than Mitsubishi Carisma 1997, whereas torque is 12 NM less than Mitsubishi Carisma 1997. Despite less power, Mitsubishi Carisma 1995 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 7.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.9 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Carisma 1997 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Mitsubishi Carisma 1995 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Carisma 1997, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Carisma 1995 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mitsubishi Carisma 1995 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Carisma 1997. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.40 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Carisma 1995 is 5 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Carisma 1997, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
460 litres | 660 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Mitsubishi Carisma 1995 has 30 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Carisma 1997. The Mitsubishi Carisma 1997 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Carisma 1997 (by 200 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`660 | 1`685 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.9/10 | 7.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Carisma has
|
Mitsubishi Carisma has
| |