Mitsubishi Carisma 1995 vs Mitsubishi Lancer 1996
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 162 NM | 108 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 15.8 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Carisma is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Carisma engine produces 41 HP more power than Mitsubishi Lancer, whereas torque is 54 NM more than Mitsubishi Lancer. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Carisma reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 8.0 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Carisma is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Carisma consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Carisma over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Carisma gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Carisma is larger. Mitsubishi Carisma is 14 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Lancer, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
460 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Carisma is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Lancer. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`660 | 1`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Carisma has
|
| |