Mitsubishi Carisma 1996 vs Toyota Corolla 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 137 NM | 150 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.3 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Toyota Corolla is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Carisma engine produces 20 HP less power than Toyota Corolla, whereas torque is 13 NM less than Toyota Corolla. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Carisma reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 7.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 8.8 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Carisma is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Mitsubishi Carisma consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Carisma could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mitsubishi Carisma consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Carisma gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.18 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.48 m | |
| Mitsubishi Carisma is 30 cm longer than the Toyota Corolla, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Carisma is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
660 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.2 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 1`630 kg | 1`300 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Toyota Corolla has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Carisma has serious deffects in 245 percent more cases than Toyota Corolla, so Toyota Corolla quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.9/10 | 8.2/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Carisma has
|
Toyota Corolla has
| |