Mitsubishi Carisma 1996 vs Nissan Almera 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 162 NM | 163 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Carisma and Nissan Almera have the same engine power, but Mitsubishi Carisma torque is 1 NM less than Nissan Almera. Mitsubishi Carisma reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 7.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.9 l/100km | 9.3 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Carisma is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Carisma consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Almera, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Carisma over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Carisma consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Almera. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Carisma gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.20 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.45 m | |
| Mitsubishi Carisma is 28 cm longer than the Nissan Almera, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Carisma is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 355 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
660 litres | 1020 litres | |
| Mitsubishi Carisma has 75 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Almera. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Almera (by 360 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`660 | 1`735 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Nissan Almera has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Carisma has serious deffects in 440 percent more cases than Nissan Almera, so Nissan Almera quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.9/10 | 9.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Carisma has
|
Nissan Almera has
| |