Mitsubishi Carisma 1996 vs Ford Focus 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.8 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 176 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Ford Focus is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Carisma engine produces 25 HP less power than Ford Focus, whereas torque is 74 NM less than Ford Focus. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Carisma reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 5.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.9 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mitsubishi Carisma consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Focus, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Carisma could require 90 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mitsubishi Carisma consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Focus. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 1240 km on highway | ||
| 1010 km with real consumption | 910 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.17 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Carisma is larger, but slightly lower. Mitsubishi Carisma is 31 cm longer than the Ford Focus, 1 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Carisma is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
660 litres | 1205 litres | |
| Mitsubishi Carisma has 80 litres more trunk space than the Ford Focus. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Focus (by 545 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`675 | 1`692 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | Ford Focus has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Carisma has serious deffects in 150 percent more cases than Ford Focus, so Ford Focus quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.9/10 | 7.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Carisma has
|
Ford Focus has
| |