Mitsubishi Carisma 1995 vs Toyota Corolla 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 1.9 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 140 HP | 90 - 192 HP | |
| Torque: | 137 - 265 NM | 130 - 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 - 15 seconds | 8.4 - 12.6 seconds | |
| In general, Toyota Corolla are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Mitsubishi Carisma. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 - 8.3 | 5.6 - 8.3 | |
|
On average, the Mitsubishi Carisma petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Toyota Corolla. On average, Mitsubishi Carisma equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.18 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.48 m | |
| Mitsubishi Carisma is 30 cm longer than the Toyota Corolla, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Carisma is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1150 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Carisma is 0.2 metres more than that of the Toyota Corolla. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`696 kg | ~ 1`243 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.9/10 | 8.2/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Carisma has
|
Toyota Corolla has
| |