Mitsubishi Carisma 1995 vs Nissan Almera 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 1.9 | 1.5 - 2.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 140 HP | 82 - 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 137 - 265 NM | 136 - 304 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 - 15 seconds | 9.2 - 14.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 - 8.3 | 4.8 - 7.8 | |
|
Mitsubishi Carisma petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan Almera. On average, a Mitsubishi Carisma with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Nissan Almera. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.20 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.45 m | |
| Mitsubishi Carisma is 28 cm longer than the Nissan Almera, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Carisma is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 355 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1150 litres | 1020 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Carisma has more luggage capacity. Mitsubishi Carisma has 85 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Almera. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Carisma (by 130 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`696 | ~ 1`756 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.9/10 | 9.2/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Carisma has
|
Nissan Almera has
| |