Mitsubishi Carisma 1995 vs Ford Focus 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.6 - 1.9 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 - 140 HP | 75 - 215 HP | |
Torque: | 137 - 265 NM | 123 - 310 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 - 15 seconds | 6.7 - 15 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 - 8.3 | 5.1 - 10.1 | |
Mitsubishi Carisma petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Focus. On average, Mitsubishi Carisma equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Focus. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.48 m | 4.17 m | |
Width: | 1.71 m | 1.71 m | |
Height: | 1.40 m | 1.43 m | |
Mitsubishi Carisma is larger, but slightly lower. Mitsubishi Carisma is 31 cm longer than the Ford Focus, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Carisma is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 350 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1150 litres | 1210 litres | |
Mitsubishi Carisma has 90 litres more trunk space than the Ford Focus. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Focus (by 60 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Carisma is 0.5 metres less than that of the Ford Focus, which means Mitsubishi Carisma can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`696 | ~ 1`658 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | average | above average | |
Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.9/10 | 7.4/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Carisma has
|
Ford Focus has
| |