Mitsubishi 3000 GT 1992 vs Toyota Celica 1990

 
Mitsubishi 3000 GT
1992 - 1995
Toyota Celica
1990 - 1994
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 3.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 286 HP204 HP
Torque: 407 NM275 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 5.9 seconds6.9 seconds
Mitsubishi 3000 GT is more dynamic to drive.
Mitsubishi 3000 GT engine produces 82 HP more power than Toyota Celica, whereas torque is 132 NM more than Toyota Celica. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi 3000 GT reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 11.19.2
The Toyota Celica is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mitsubishi 3000 GT consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi 3000 GT could require 285 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 75 litres68 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 670 km in combined cycle730 km in combined cycle
Toyota Celica gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.56 m4.42 m
Width: 1.84 m1.74 m
Height: 1.28 m1.30 m
Mitsubishi 3000 GT is larger, but slightly lower.
Mitsubishi 3000 GT is 14 cm longer than the Toyota Celica, 10 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi 3000 GT is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data320 litres
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi 3000 GT is 0.4 metres more than that of the Toyota Celica, which means Mitsubishi 3000 GT can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): no data1`890
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 25 0005000
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi 3000 GT has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Toyota Celica has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv