Mitsubishi 3000 GT 1992 vs Toyota Celica 1990
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 286 HP | 204 HP | |
Torque: | 407 NM | 275 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.9 seconds | 6.9 seconds | |
Mitsubishi 3000 GT is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi 3000 GT engine produces 82 HP more power than Toyota Celica, whereas torque is 132 NM more than Toyota Celica. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi 3000 GT reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.1 | 9.2 | |
The Toyota Celica is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi 3000 GT consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi 3000 GT could require 285 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 68 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
Toyota Celica gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.56 m | 4.42 m | |
Width: | 1.84 m | 1.74 m | |
Height: | 1.28 m | 1.30 m | |
Mitsubishi 3000 GT is larger, but slightly lower. Mitsubishi 3000 GT is 14 cm longer than the Toyota Celica, 10 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi 3000 GT is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 320 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi 3000 GT is 0.4 metres more than that of the Toyota Celica, which means Mitsubishi 3000 GT can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`890 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 25 000 | 5000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi 3000 GT has
|
Toyota Celica has
| |