Mitsubishi 3000 GT 1995 vs Volvo S60 2002
Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 286 HP | 210 HP | |
Torque: | 407 NM | 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.9 seconds | 7.3 seconds | |
Mitsubishi 3000 GT is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi 3000 GT engine produces 76 HP more power than Volvo S60, whereas torque is 87 NM more than Volvo S60. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi 3000 GT reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.4 | 9.8 | |
The Volvo S60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi 3000 GT consumes 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi 3000 GT could require 390 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
780 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
Volvo S60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.57 m | 4.58 m | |
Width: | 1.84 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.28 m | 1.43 m | |
Mitsubishi 3000 GT is 1 cm shorter than the Volvo S60, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi 3000 GT is 15 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 424 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1034 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi 3000 GT is 0.6 metres less than that of the Volvo S60, which means Mitsubishi 3000 GT can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`060 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 25 000 | 1400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi 3000 GT has
|
Volvo S60 has
| |