Mitsubishi 3000 GT 1995 vs Ford Probe 1994
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 286 HP | 164 HP | |
| Torque: | 407 NM | 212 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.9 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi 3000 GT is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi 3000 GT engine produces 122 HP more power than Ford Probe, whereas torque is 195 NM more than Ford Probe. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi 3000 GT reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.4 | 10.1 | |
|
The Ford Probe is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi 3000 GT consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Probe, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi 3000 GT could require 345 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.28 m | 1.32 m | |
| Mitsubishi 3000 GT is 1 cm shorter than the Ford Probe, 6 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi 3000 GT is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi 3000 GT is 0.2 metres more than that of the Ford Probe. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 25 000 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi 3000 GT has
|
Ford Probe has
| |