Mitsubishi 3000 GT 1995 vs Nissan 200 SX 1988
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 286 HP | 169 HP | |
| Torque: | 407 NM | 224 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.9 seconds | 7.5 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi 3000 GT is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi 3000 GT engine produces 117 HP more power than Nissan 200 SX, whereas torque is 183 NM more than Nissan 200 SX. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi 3000 GT reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.4 | 9.1 | |
|
The Nissan 200 SX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi 3000 GT consumes 3.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan 200 SX, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi 3000 GT could require 495 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| Nissan 200 SX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.28 m | 1.29 m | |
|
Mitsubishi 3000 GT is larger, but slightly lower. Mitsubishi 3000 GT is 4 cm longer than the Nissan 200 SX, 15 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi 3000 GT is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 320 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`675 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 25 000 | 17 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi 3000 GT has
|
Nissan 200 SX has
| |