Mitsubishi 3000 GT 1995 vs Jaguar XJS 1991
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 5.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 286 HP | 284 HP | |
| Torque: | 407 NM | 415 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.9 seconds | 8.2 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi 3000 GT is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi 3000 GT engine produces 2 HP more power than Jaguar XJS, but torque is 8 NM less than Jaguar XJS. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi 3000 GT reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.4 | 13.4 | |
|
The Mitsubishi 3000 GT is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi 3000 GT consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XJS, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi 3000 GT over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 89 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
| Jaguar XJS gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.28 m | 1.25 m | |
| Mitsubishi 3000 GT is 25 cm shorter than the Jaguar XJS, 5 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi 3000 GT is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 407 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 13 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi 3000 GT is 1.6 metres less than that of the Jaguar XJS, which means Mitsubishi 3000 GT can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`175 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 25 000 | 25 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi 3000 GT has
|
Jaguar XJS has
| |