Mitsubishi 3000 GT 1995 vs Honda CRX 1992
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 286 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 407 NM | 142 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.9 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi 3000 GT is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi 3000 GT engine produces 161 HP more power than Honda CRX, whereas torque is 265 NM more than Honda CRX. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi 3000 GT reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.4 | 7.5 | |
|
The Honda CRX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi 3000 GT consumes 4.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CRX, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi 3000 GT could require 735 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.28 m | 1.26 m | |
|
Mitsubishi 3000 GT is larger. Mitsubishi 3000 GT is 57 cm longer than the Honda CRX, 14 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi 3000 GT is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 9.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi 3000 GT is 2.2 metres more than that of the Honda CRX, which means Mitsubishi 3000 GT can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 25 000 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi 3000 GT has
|
Honda CRX has
| |