Mitsubishi 3000 GT 1995 vs Ford Mustang 1994
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 286 HP | 147 HP | |
| Torque: | 407 NM | 292 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.9 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi 3000 GT is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi 3000 GT engine produces 139 HP more power than Ford Mustang, whereas torque is 115 NM more than Ford Mustang. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi 3000 GT reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.4 | 9.3 | |
|
The Ford Mustang is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi 3000 GT consumes 3.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mustang, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi 3000 GT could require 465 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 740 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.28 m | 1.34 m | |
| Mitsubishi 3000 GT is 4 cm shorter than the Ford Mustang, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi 3000 GT is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi 3000 GT is 0.3 metres less than that of the Ford Mustang. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi 3000 GT has
|
Ford Mustang has
| |