Mitsubishi 3000 GT 1995 vs Audi Coupe 1991
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 286 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 407 NM | 165 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.9 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi 3000 GT is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi 3000 GT engine produces 170 HP more power than Audi Coupe, whereas torque is 242 NM more than Audi Coupe. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi 3000 GT reaches 100 km/h speed 5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.4 | 8.2 | |
|
The Audi Coupe is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi 3000 GT consumes 4.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Coupe, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi 3000 GT could require 630 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| Audi Coupe gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.28 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Mitsubishi 3000 GT is larger, but lower. Mitsubishi 3000 GT is 20 cm longer than the Audi Coupe, 12 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi 3000 GT is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 296 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi 3000 GT is 0.4 metres more than that of the Audi Coupe, which means Mitsubishi 3000 GT can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 1`650 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi 3000 GT has
|
Audi Coupe has
| |